As some of you are already aware, I post my work here, as well as in my flickr portfoglio, and a couple more sites...
Generally, with some minor variations, the overall response I receive is similar, in terms of artistic quality, and technical aspects.
That is, until today... A certain site, that I registered in recently, has rejected my "at the beach" render, in terms of quality.
Apparently, it doesn't catches in par, with the quality standards of the site.
I will not name the site in question, but this is a major contradiction. It's a piece that has gotten positive responses everywhere, despite it's technical flaws. So, either "everywhere" is having severely lowered standards, or a certain site is heavily biased.
I will not name the site, for good politics sake.